Life is better with freedom
Cop tells driver he wrote him tickets because he did not like his attitude
REVEIW OF THE INCIDENT:
Driver is taking his son to hockey practice. Police pull over the driver. The cop seems pissed off that the driver is filming him.
The cop goes to his car and writes the driver a ticket for changing lanes unsafely. The cop hands the driver the ticket and the cop says do you have any questions and the driver says what did I do that was unsafe? The cop is like you can speak to a attorney and ask him. The driver says you just asked me if I had any questions. The cops says you changed lanes unsafely twice, I could have wrote you two tickets but I just gave you one. The driver is like I was not driving faster then the speed limit and whenever I changed lanes I used the turn signal, so what was unsafe about it.
The cop says you can take it to court and I will tell you then what was unsafe about it in court. The cop finally says you got close to the car in front of you. The driver says that is why I usually change lanes. That is not unsafe driving. The cop tells the driver to give him the license back because now he decided to write him two more tickets. The driver asks the cop to please not take so long writing him more tickets because he is trying to get his son to hockey practice. The cop smiles and says I will do my best sir.
The cop comes back 35 minutes later with another ticket and says you still got your camera rolling, is it still on. The driver asked what took so long and the cop says it takes time for the computer to boot up. Then the cop tells the driver, your attitude is 100% the reason why you got these tickets.
MY ANALYSIS:
Crime - an act harmful to another person or a violation of your rights.
People have the right to drive down the road without being harassed by men with guns. The victim was driving down the street. He did not commit a crime. He did not harm anyone or violate anyone's rights, therefore the cop should not have pulled him over. The cop by pulling him over violated the victims right to liberty, which is a crime. If the driver did not stop, there is a good chance that the police would end up chasing him down, assault him, and even possibly kill him and his son.
The real purpose of this traffic stop was to give the victim a ticket to take the victims money from him against his will. What you are really seeing in this video is a man with a gun pulling the victim over against his will to rob him. Which may explain why the police officer does not want the victim filming him while he commits a robbery.
Governments true purpose is to rule and rob you. They want you to follow there rules and pay there taxes and fines and if you don't they will throw you in a cage or kill you. They are not here to protect and serve you. They are here to rule and rob you.
Government supports itself by taking peoples money without there consent with the threat of force. The government calls it taxation or fines but it is robbery and it is a violation of our rights. Taxation is theft. A government that funds itself thru theft is a criminal organization.
Law enforcement is paid with the money that is stolen from you in the form of taxes and fines. The relationship between law enforcement and the people is really like the relationship between a criminal and his victim. Criminals do not respect there victims. If they have no respect for you they also have no respect for your rights and this is why they have no problem violating your rights. It is a crime to violate your rights. A person who violates your rights is a criminal.
Our government has been stealing from us and disarming us and it will only get worse as time goes on. Over time government will lose more and more respect for the people and we will be in greater danger and the people will be less able to defend themselves. People wonder why law enforcement acts the way they act. They are enforcers for a criminal organization. How would you expect them to act?
----------------------------------------------------
Robbery - is the crime of taking or attempting to take anything of value by force or threat of force or by putting the victim in fear.
Did the police officer commit the crime of robbery by giving the victim tickets demanding money from him?
----------------------------------------------------
Harassment - behavior which appears to be disturbing or threatening.
Should innocent people be allowed to drive down the road without being harassed by men with guns?
Did the police officer commit the crime of harassment?
----------------------------------------------------
The right to liberty - The right to do whatever you want as long as your not violating the rights of others.
Did the police officer violate the victims right to liberty?
ANALYSIS OF THE DRIVERS ACTIONS:
Did the driver harm anyone, steal anything, or threaten anyone? No
Did driver violate anyone's individual rights? No
Was the interaction between driver and the cop voluntary? No
The driver did nothing wrong, was acting within his rights, and should not have been pulled over.
ANALYSIS OF THE COPS ACTIONS:
Did the cop harm, steal, or threaten the victim? Yes
Did the cop violate the victims individual rights? Yes
The cop violated the victims rights. The cops actions are criminal.
WRONG IS WRONG, NO MATTER WHO DOES IT:
People have the irrational belief that government is allowed to do things that you can't. So the resistance in peoples minds is turned off and they think government authority is OK, logical, and reasonable. But if people would examine the cause and effect of what is really happening. They would say it is logical to resist someone who wants to harm you, steal from you, threaten you, or violate your rights.
No matter how government employees are selected they are only human beings and they have no rights or claims that are higher then those of any other human. No one has the right to harm you, steal from you, threaten you, or violate your rights. We can not give people any rights that we do not have ourselves. Government should never be able to do anything you can't do. If something is wrong for you to do, it should also be wrong for government to do. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it.
GOVERNMENT IS ...
Government is control by force. The authority claimed by governments is unique because it is considered a license to use force against peaceful people. People claim it is acceptable for government to do things that an individual would never be allowed to do. This is why governments come up with special words to obscure what they are really doing. War is mass murder. Taxation is theft. Even when government gives money to someone in need it must first steal that money from someone else. No one has the right to control others by force, even if they claim to have the majority behind them.
People need to realize that government does not have the right to rule. Victims of this gang called the government imagine an obligation to obey it. Government is an entity that is imagined to have the right to do things that individuals do not have the right to do. Such as steal and they call it taxation. Such as initiating violence and calling it law enforcement. Such as committing murder and calling it national defense.
ONCE YOU SEE THE TRUTH:
The great government lie is that it exists for the good of its victims. To obscure the truth, governments go to great lengths with propaganda intended to change the way we think and thus how we act. The greatest measure of what governments are capable of with propaganda is how much they have convinced us to identify with them so that anyone who challenges their power is seen as an enemy of the people. The most potent weapon in the hand of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.
The first step towards freedom is realizing that you do not know everything. Once you realize that you do not know everything then your mind will be more open and it will be easier for you to see the truth. Once you see the truth, you can set yourself free.
A government that violates your rights and commits theft, extortion, and violence, is a criminal organization. Once people realize that. They can rid themselves of the belief that they have an obligation to obey government. Then you can have free people who can decide for themselves what they can do.
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS:
1 - The right to liberty - The right to do whatever you want as long as your not violating the rights of others.
2 - The right to self-defense - The right to defend yourself, your property, and your rights.
3 - The right to own and carry weapons - So you can defend yourself, your property, and your rights.
4 - The right to self-ownership - We own ourselves. No one can claim even partial ownership over you without violating your rights.
5 - The right to free speech - The right to communicate your opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship.
6 - The right to privacy - No one has the right to violate your privacy.
- Individual rights are rights your born with and no one can legally take away from you.
- People can do whatever they want within there rights as long as they do not violate the rights of others.
- Any law that violates your rights is null and void. Anyone that violates your rights is a criminal.
LIBERTY IS NOT A BATTLE:
Liberty is not a battle that requires the conversion of others in order to win.
Liberty is won when you accept the fact that you own yourself, that you have individual rights, and no one has the right to violate your rights.
When you accept that you are liberated.
GEORGE WASHINGTON:
When government takes away citizens right to bear arms it becomes the citizens duty to take away the governments right to govern. - George Washington
PRINCIPLES OF FREEDOM:
1 - All people are born free, created equal, and have individual rights.
2 - All interactions between people should be voluntary and free of force, fraud, and threats.
3 - People have the right to self-ownership. Self-ownership means not only that you own yourself, but everyone owns themselves. The best way to ensure respect for our self-ownership is to respect the rights of others. Without self-ownership, there is no freedom.
4 - No one can claim even partial ownership over a person without violating there rights. Taxing people without there consent under the threat of force is robbery and is a violation of our rights. Free people get to decide for themselves how there money is spent.
5 - Free people have the right to carry weapons to defend themselves, there property, and there rights. We never have an obligation to let anyone commit aggression against us. No one has the right to harm you, steal from you, threaten you, or violate your rights.
6 - To help secure our individual rights, governments may be created, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter it, abolish it, or withdraw there consent to be governed.
7 - We have the right to seek leaders for ourselves but we have no right to force rulers on others. No matter how leaders are selected they are only human beings and they have no rights or claims that are higher then those of any other human. No one has the right to murder, enslave, or to steal. We can not give people any rights that we do not have ourselves.
THE FREEDOM SOLUTION:
There are two kinds of people. People who prefer big government (statists) and people who prefer freedom.
Statists want government to have a great deal of power over the economy and individual behavior.
People who prefer freedom, want to have a great deal of control over there own lives.
We should just let each group live the way they want too.
If your a person who prefers statism then you can have all the government you want, as long as you do not violate the rights of others.
If your a person who prefers freedom then you can have all the freedom you want, as long as you do not violate the rights of others.
Freedom means that people get to decide for themselves how they want to live.
WHAT RIGHTS CAN GOVERNMENT HAVE:
- Can you delegate to another human being a right that you do not have?
- Can two people delegate a right to a human being that neither of them have?
- Can seven million people delegate a right to a human being that none of them have?
- Can someone delegate the right to steal my money to government?
- Can seven million people delegate to government the right to steal my money?
- Can anyone in government have a right that I do not have?
THEFT AND ROBBERY:
- Is it wrong if someone takes your money or property without your permission or consent (Theft)?
- Is it wrong if someone is taking or attempting to take your money or property by force, threat of force, or by putting the victim in fear (Robbery)?
- If something is wrong for a individual to do, should it also be wrong for the government to do?
- Is it fair to say, wrong is wrong, no matter who does it?
YOUR THE VICTIM OF A ROBBERY!!!
- Should it make a difference what color the robbers skin is?
- Should it make a difference if the robbers are employed or unemployed?
- Should it make a difference if the robbers are employed by the government?
- Should it make a difference if the robbers are IRS agents?
- Is it fair to say, wrong is wrong, no matter who does it?
TAXATION:
- Is it wrong if someone takes your money or property without your permission or consent (Taxation)?
- Is it wrong if someone is taking or attempting to take your money or property by force, threat of force, or by putting the victim in fear (Taxation)?
- If something is wrong for a individual to do, should it also be wrong for the government to do?
- Is it fair to say, wrong is wrong, no matter who does it?
VOTING:
- Does government want to rule you by forcing you to obey there laws?
- Does government want to rob you by forcing you to pay there taxes?
- If you get to choose between two politicians who want to rule and rob you, does that mean your free?
- Does having the right to vote, mean that you are free?
ASSAULT:
Assault - physically attacking another person or threatening them with a weapon.
- Is it wrong when someone assaults an innocent person?
- If something is wrong for a individual to do, should it also be wrong for the government to do?
- Is it fair to say, wrong is wrong, no matter who does it?
GUNS:
- Why do no mass murders occur in a police station, full of people with guns?
- Why do no mass murders occur in a gun store, full of people with guns?
- Why do no mass murders occur in a shooting range, full of people with guns?
- Why is it becoming more common to have mass murders in places with gun free zones, full of people without guns?
- Is it fair to say, the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is if there is good guy with a gun who is willing to defend himself?
- Do people have the right to defend themselves?
DEFENDING YOUR RIGHTS:
- Should people respect your rights?
- Should you respect the rights of others?
- Do people have the right to defend themselves, there rights, and there property?
- If we do not defend our rights, could we end up losing our rights?
- If we lose our rights, do we also lose our freedom?
- If we lose our freedom, are we just tax slaves?
HARASSMENT:
Harassment - behavior which appears to be disturbing or threatening.
- Is it wrong when someone harasses an innocent person?
- If something is wrong for a individual to do, should it also be wrong for the government to do?
- Is it fair to say, wrong is wrong, no matter who does it?
DOES GOVERNMENT PROTECT OUR RIGHTS:
- Should government create laws that violate our rights?
- Should government violate our rights?
- Should police enforce laws that violate our rights?
- Is government the biggest violator of our individual rights?
WHAT IS MORE DANGEROUS:
- Has government killed or imprisoned millions of people for victimless crimes?
- What is more dangerous, freedom or a government that has authority over you?
- Is government the biggest threat to our freedom?
INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PEOPLE:
- Should interactions between people be voluntary?
- Should interactions between people be free of force, fraud, and threats?
DO WE HAVE A OBLIGATION TO OBEY:
- If a person harms you, steals from you, threatens you, or violates your rights, is he a criminal?
- Do we have an obligation to obey criminals?
- If government harms you, steals from you, threatens you, or violates your rights, is it a criminal organization?
- Do we have an obligation to obey a criminal organization?
- Do we have an obligation to obey anyone who violates our rights?
DO YOU OWN YOURSELF:
- Does anyone have the right to claim ownership over you?
- Do you own yourself or is someone else your master?
